In this article I am going to prove to you why amongst other things we have holocaust denial laws today, and what it was that caused those laws to be enacted.
But first let’s start in 1919 when an early incarnation of the holocaust of 6 million Jews is reported by former Governor of New York, Martin H. Glynn in the American Hebrew magazine. This holocaust of six million Jews in Romania, Poland and the Ukraine clearly doesn’t receive the publicity required and quietly disappears from history
However Martin H. Glynn’s unsubstantiated and abandoned claims certainly prove influential as ten separate holocausts of 6 million Jews are reported in various newspapers between 1915 and 1938. You can see the stories from each of these newspapers in the YouTube video below.
In light of the Nuremberg Trials in which Nazi confessions are reported worldwide, let’s move swiftly forward to January 9th 1949 when in relation to alleged Nazi confessions at the Dachau trials, the Washington Daily News, gives an account of the American Judge, Edward L. Van Roden, in which he describes the methods via which investigators obtained confessions as,
“Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations…The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months…The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses…All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American Investigators.”
The names of some of these so called, “American Investigators,” is particularly interesting: Captain Raphael Shumacker; Lieutenant William R. Perl; Morris Ellowitz; Harry Thon; Joseph Kirschbaum; and the chief of the Dachau War Crimes Branch, Colonel A. H. Rosenfeld.
Arthur R. Butz in his 1976 seminal work on the alleged holocaust, “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century,” reports the following interesting extract of these trials,
“One notable incident occurred when investigator Joseph Kirschbaum brought a certain Einstein into court to testify that the accused Menzel had murdered Einstein’s brother. When the accused was able to point out that the brother was alive and well and, in fact, sitting in court, Kirschbaum was deeply embarrassed and scolded poor Einstein:
‘How can we bring this pig to the gallows, if you are so stupid as to bring your brother into court?’
The U.S. Army authorities in charge admitted some of these things. When the chief of the Dachau War Crimes Branch, Colonel A. H. Rosenfeld, quit his post in 1948, he was asked by newspapermen if there was any truth to the stories about the mock trials, at which sham death sentences had been passed. He replied:
‘Yes, of course. We couldn’t have made these birds talk otherwise…It was a trick and it worked like a charm.’
Now as we carry on looking at the work of historical revisionists, we move forward to 1974 when the original expose questioning the official holocaust narrative, Richard E. Harwood’s, “Did Six Million Really Die?” is published, in which he states,
“The question most pertinent to the extermination legend is, of course: how many of the 3 million European Jews under German control survived after 1945? The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee estimated the number of survivors in Europe to be only one and a half million, but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is proved by the growing number of Jews claiming compensation from the West German Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965 the number of these claimants registered with the West German Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000 (Aufbau, June 30, 1965).”
Two years later in 1976 the South African Jewish Board of Deputies applies to get, “Did Six Million Really Die?” banned in South Africa. Whilst the local distributor SED Brown tried their best to fight this censorship, their funds were simply insufficient to mount an appeal against such a well-funded organisation.
Carrying on with holocaust revisionism, in his 1978 book, “Auschwitz – A Judge Looks At The Evidence,” German Judge, “Wilhelm Staglich,” gives an account of his impressions of the Auschwitz Camp in 1944 based upon several visits there whilst he was stationed in the village of Osiek, nearby:
“I was inside the camp three or four times altogether. On none of these visits did I see gassing installations, crematoria, instruments of torture, or similar horrors…On none of my visits did I find that inmates – at least the ones present in the camp, for example inmates employed in the various workshops or on clean-up details – were badly, much less inhumanely, treated…
Finally I can report that the German residents of Osiek were unaware of mass exterminations or other atrocities in the camp. At any rate, they never spoke to me of such things.
As an afterthought, I should like to mention the following: In the Dachau Concentration Camp Museum, there is a picture captioned ‘Auschwitz cremation furnaces.’ They reminded me of the baking ovens shown to us by an inmate working in the camp bakery.”
Moving onto 1982 in the Summer Edition of the, “Journal of Historical Review,” Professor Robert Faurisson states,
“The truth obliges me to say that the Diary of Anne Frank is only a simple literary fraud.”
He cites evidence in which the structure of the house the family allegedly hid in does not resemble the structure of the house in the diary and also that two forms of handwriting supposedly written by Anne Frank only four months apart, in no way resemble each other.
Interestingly, on the subject of handwriting there are parts of the diary that were written in a ballpoint pen which was not available on the market until long after the end of World War 2.
In 1984 in Toronto, Canada, German publisher, “Ernst Zundel,” distributes his own edition of, “Did Six Million Really Die?” and sends copies out to: Canadian Members of Parliament; members of the clergy; journalists; and broadcasters. A year later Ernst Zundel is subsequently put on trial and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment followed by automatic deportation, after a complaint under an obscure law prohibiting the publication of, “false news,” by a certain, “Sabrina Citron,” who ran an organisation called the, “Holocaust Remembrance Association.”
This sentence was passed even though both the defence and the prosecution agreed that the bulk of, “Did Six Million Really Die?” was correct and only small points were in dispute. Interestingly it is subsequently revealed that the law firm of the presiding judge, “Hugh Loeke,” did work for Mrs Citron’s Holocaust Remembrance Association whilst he was a barrister there.
Moving forward to February 1988, the first forensic examination of the alleged execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek, is conducted by, “Fred Leuchter,” and subsequently published as, “The Leuchter Report.”
Fred Leuchter is an engineer who specialises in the design and fabrication of execution hardware used in prisons throughout the United States. Indeed one of his projects was the design of a new gas chamber at the Missouri State Penitentiary at Jefferson City.
In essence Fred Leuchter took samples from the walls of the alleged gas chambers and also from the walls of the de-lousing chambers so he could compare the claim that rather than Zyklon B being used to gas inmates of the various camps, it was actually used to de-louse the inmates clothing of lice in order to prevent outbreaks of typhus.
His results were overwhelming. He could find no trace of Zyklon B in the walls of the alleged gas chambers yet it was overwhelmingly prevalent in the walls of the de-lousing chambers where the inmates’ clothing was cleaned of lice.
I will leave the last word on this to Mr Leucter which I quote from the conclusion of his report,
“After reviewing all the material and inspecting all of the sites at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek your author finds the evidence overwhelming:
There were no execution gas chambers at any of these locations.
It is the best engineering opinion of this author that the alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could not have been, or now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers.”
The Leuchter report was actually commissioned by Ernst Zundel, to act in his defence, after his 1985 conviction was overturned by the Ontario Court of Appeal in 1987 and a retrial was ordered to commence in January 1988.
Even though Fred Leuchter did not question the official Holocaust narrative, Professor Robert Faurisson (who had taken an interest in the Zundel case and offered his assistance) was confident that an investigation on the basis of Leuchter’s skills in relation to poison gas and execution chambers would successfully serve as the core of Ernst Zundel’s defence.
Despite Fred Leuchter’s neutral position in questioning the official version of the holocaust and his evidence based upon the exact science of forensic chemistry, Ernst Zundel is once again found guilty albeit this time he is given a nine month sentence as opposed to the 15 month one he was given previously. Oh and interestingly he is granted bail after signing a, “gag order,” promising not to write or speak about the, “Holocaust.”
In 1989 in the former concentration camp of Auschwitz, a plaque claiming that four million people had been murdered there, mainly Jews, is replaced with a plaque stating that one and a half million had died there. Strangely, the figure of six million Jews dying in the holocaust is not reduced accordingly to reflect this two and a half million reduction of the stated death toll at Auschwitz. Furthermore, no reasons for this reduction in the death toll at Auschwitz, nor the fact the six million figure has not been reduced to reflect this reduction are ever given.
I will now quote from the 1990 entry in my 2012 book, “The Synagogue Of Satan – Updated, Expanded, And Uncensored,”
“Due to a mass panic among Jewish groups, regarding alleged discrepancies in the official version of the holocaust, they use their influence to ensure France introduces and passes the Gayssot law, making Holocaust denial a crime. The following European countries follow suit: Germany (who already had limited holocaust denial laws); Switzerland; Austria; Belgium; Romania; Czech Republic; Lithuania; Poland; and Slovakia. This is done to protect the Jews greatest weapon against those who criticise their criminal actions, the alleged slaughter of six million Jews during World War 2, a weapon which they use continually to make them appear the unfairly persecuted underdog, and thus justify their oppressive actions against other races. It is also done to protect their, “holocaust industry,” which generates billions of dollars for them every year in so called, “reparations,” which would no doubt have to be paid back if the actual facts were revealed regarding this alleged historical event. The Jews’ alleged holocaust is the only historical event that historians are sentenced to jailed for researching (in so-called free speech countries), which has led to the following unsatisfactory ring-fenced historical conclusions.
Elie Wiesel’s testimony in the 1966 book, “The Jews of Silence,” that the blood of Jews murdered by Nazis spurted in geysers out of the ground where they were buried for months afterward – this cannot be questioned.
Or Martin Gilbert’s testimony in the 1981 book, “Auschwitz and the Allies,” that in the spring and summer of 1942 hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed everyday (which at 200,000 a day for 17 weeks would equal just under 24 million Jews, when figures indicate weren’t that many in the world at the time) – this cannot be questioned.
Or Abraham Bomba’s testimony in the 1985 film, “Shoah,” that he worked in a 4 by 4 metre barber shop in Treblinka which somehow accommodated 15 other barbers and 70 to 80 women and children whose hair they cut in 8 minutes, before he and the barbers left the room for 5 minutes whilst the women and children were gassed and then re-entered with the barbers to repeat the process despite the fact the room would still be full of gas – this cannot be questioned.
Or Arnold Friedman’s 1985 testimony at the trial of Ernst Zundel, that one could tell what nationality of Jew was being burned in the ovens by the colour of the flames: green for a Polish Jew; blue for a Hungarian Jew, etc, that shot out of the crematorium chimney – this cannot be questioned.
Or the claims that the Nazis made bars of soap out of their Jewish victims, that Jewish researchers Deborah Lipstadt and Yehuda Bauer have since admitted was false – this cannot be questioned.”
When I put this research together, I missed the vital point here. Why were these laws not introduced earlier? Or why were they introduced now? I think The Leuchter Report is the smoking gun answer to that. It is abundantly clear that as soon as a forensic study was undertaken showing the claims of poison gassings to be patently false, suddenly laws start popping up all over Europe threatening anyone who questioned the official holocaust narrative with imprisonment. Basically the Jews couldn’t argue with scientific evidence, so they chose to make the alleged holocaust the only part of mainstream history you can be prosecuted and jailed for: researching; discussing; or disputing.
And now a quote from the 2005 entry in, “The Synagogue Of Satan – Updated, Expanded, And Uncensored,”
“On December 5th, following accusations from holocaust revisionists, that World War 2 leaders never mentioned the alleged holocaust of the Jews in gas chambers, Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus at the University of Ulster, reports his research into this matter, as follows,
‘I’ve checked out Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi, ‘gas chambers,’ a, ‘genocide of the Jews,’ or of, ‘six million,’ Jewish victims of the war.
This is astonishing. How can it be explained? Eisenhower’s, ‘Crusade in Europe,’ is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s, ‘Second World War,’ total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume, ‘Memoires de guerre,’ is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi, ‘gas chambers,’ a, ‘genocide,’ of the Jews, or of, ‘six million,’ Jewish victims of the war.’
This should have come as no surprise to Professor Lynn, as even the most liberal of readers cannot explain why, as I have already mentioned, the two and a half million reduction of the four million dead to one and a half million at Auschwitz in 1989 is never deducted from the six million the Jews allege died in the holocaust. Here are some other facts the Jews have never explained regarding the holocaust they allege happened to six million of their brethren in World War 2:
The World Almanac and Book of Facts for 1945 estimated that in 1939 the population of Jews in the world was 15,688,259, which in 1945 had decreased to 15,192,089. That is a decrease of only 496,170, not 6 million, and by the way, the Almanac’s source for these figures is the American Jewish Committee. Furthermore the number of Jews in Europe in 1939 are shown as 8,939,608 and in 1945, 9,372,666, which is a population increase of 422,058 after the alleged holocaust of 6 million.
Despite these official figures this did not stop nearly 4 million Jews applying for reparations from Germany after the war, which begs the question that if this many Jews suffered at the hands of the Germans during the war and survived, how many did the Germans actually kill? I cannot see how the Jews can have it both ways, but as pointed out by another prominent researcher into this intrigue, there’s no business like Shoah Business!
If the Zyklon B gas was used to kill Jews in gas chambers, why were no traces of the chemical ever found within the walls of the gas chambers, when traces have been found in the walls of the delousing chambers, which records indicate the gas was used for: delousing the clothing of camp inmates. This may be why research chemist for 33 years with the Dupont Corporation, Dr. William B. Lindsey stated under oath in Canada in 1985, “I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with Zyklon B in this manner. I consider it absolutely impossible.”
The claim that six million Jews gassed were then incinerated in ovens does not make sense when a number of crematoria experts have confirmed that it takes a minimum of 2 hours to burn one human body in an incinerator, yet the Jews claim the Nazis were burning 25,000 bodies a day at Auschwitz which had only two crematoria ovens. Furthermore the ashes generated by the cremation of 6 million would weigh in at a minimum of 6,000 tonnes (minimum 1 kilogram of ash per body), yet Allied aerial reconnaissance photographs revealed no piles of ash at the concentration camps. Why?
No autopsy on even one Jewish body found at the concentration camps has ever proved a Jew was killed by poison gas. Teams of pathologists followed the invasion forces into Europe and did autopsies on thousands of bodies found at the camps. Dr. Larson, pathologist with the Judge Advocate Generals Office led these teams and reported, ‘Not one case of death by poison gas was found.’ Dr John E. Gordon who was with the United States forces stated, ‘Most deaths in concentration camps were caused, not by starvation or maltreatment, but by typhus.’ Why are these professional medical accounts missing from the mainstream reporting on the holocaust?
If 6 million Jews died as the Jews claim, why is it that the impartial International Red Cross have claimed 271,504 prisoners (not just Jews) died in total throughout the war in the concentration camps, which they even break down in a camp by camp list. Furthermore the Red Cross Report of 1948 explains that most of these casualties were at the end of the war as the saturation bombing by the Allies paralysed the German transport system, and thus no food reached the camps resulting in many inmates dying of starvation. Could this explain the pictures of under-nourished inmates and emaciated corpses?
A, ‘Holocaust Survivor,’ is deemed to be any Jew who lived in any country occupied or controlled by the Nazi regime or; who was forced to flee because of the Nazis. On that basis any Jew who left Europe from 1933 onwards and settled in another country is regarded as a holocaust survivor and thus can claim reparations, despite never so much as having gone near a prison camp. Why?
I’ll leave the last word to Bobby Fischer, widely regarded as the greatest chess player of all time, who incidentally was Jewish,
‘I exposed the holocaust as never having happened. Totally made up. The Jews are liars. There is not a shred of truth to this holocaust.’”
In 2006, Ernst Zundel, now living in Germany after being deported by Canada is tried for, ‘Holocaust Denial,’ and faces a maximum five year sentence. In the lead-up to this trial his original lawyer, Horst Mahler is barred from representing him and during the trial his replacement lawyer, Sylvia Stolz is also removed from the court and astonishingly jailed for three and a half years in 2008. She is furthermore stripped of her licence to practice law. So much for a fair judicial system in Germany when you consider lawyers can be jailed for representing their clients.
The outcome of this show trial is obviously a foregone conclusion and as expected Ernst Zundel is jailed for the full 5 year term.
Finally in 2015 the Fifth Edition of Peter Winter’s book, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction? is released. In it he states of the French historian, Professor Paul Rassinier,
“French anti-Nazi and resistance fighter Paul Rassinier was arrested by the Gestapo and imprisoned in Buchenwald concentration camp. After the war, he was elected to the French National Assembly and awarded heroism medals. He was shocked to find that others claimed there were gas chambers at Buchenwald, something he knew was a lie because of his internment there. Rassinier spent the rest of his life exposing the lies behind the ‘Holocaust’ and, as a result, his memoirs of internment at Buchenwald are ignored by the Holocaust storytellers.”
In conclusion, rather than those Jew-controlled governments who tell you to believe the official holocaust narrative unless you want to face imprisonment, I present these findings to you and say, Holocaust Or Holohoax? YOU Be The Judge!
Andrew Carrington Hitchcock
08 October 2015
P.S. As reported in the mainstream media in August 2015, the Jew Rachel Yehuda, claims holocaust suffering is passed down through DNA, so I guess as the so-called holocaust survivors are dying off, those holocaust reparations are going to be the gift that keeps on giving!